-
-
-
Lowering the vine to allow for taping the frame against hot spots.
-
-
Hello again, dear reader…
Time flies, don’t it? It’s over a month since I wrote anything here. Lots of stuff’s been going on though. I guess that’s why I’ve been too busy to write.
Mainly, we got the tunnel skinned. It took five of us most of a day to do the job. Stella trashed the weeds with an industrial strimmer so we could actually get near the job; Doug and Raymond began digging out the trenches; Anne gently lowered the New York Muscat vine from the spine of the tunnel so we could tape the tubing against hot spots developing; and one of us, the feeble one, lumberingly wielded a fork and a Swoe on the soil below. Despite a lot of hacking, scything and digging, there were still a lot of weeds to get out before the skin went on, and I knew from exhausting experience that a bit of hard work now was a much better option than trying to do the job when the skin was on and the temperature went tropical. ‘Seren’, the brown dog, pottered about amiably as brown dogs do, sticking her nose into every crevice (human and otherwise) and wagging fit to bust. I’ll try to attach a couple of snaps if I can understand how to.
On the writing front, I’ve been learning more things than I ever wanted to about ebooks, PDFs, Print On Demand, hyperlinks, page formatting, and far too many other tekkie things. I’m still overwhelmed, actually, although I’ve definitely made some progress. At one point I was wrestling with four separate programs, each of which seemed to be stubbornly incompatible with the other three. And, of course, each of the four was more or less totally incomprehensible to a normal non-tekky human being. The ‘Help’ files could only help if you already knew what you were doing. Word once warned me that there was a ‘Section 1′ error. Did I want to continue? Well it would have been helpful to know how to make a decision, would it not? Did Word offer an explanation? Of course not. Worse yet, there was no mention of ‘Section 1′ in the entire ‘Help’ file. How do they get away with being allowed to sell such sub-standard rubbish? I guess ‘monopoly’ is the answer.
Open Office is worth a try, by the way. It’s FREE!!! and seems to work at least as well as Word, although the Help is still beyond my understanding. One good thing is that it will make PDFs for you, and it seems that any would-be epublisher needs PDFs.
Somebody pointed me at Primo, also FREE!!, which allows you to make four different sorts of PDF. Oh Lordie…. One is hard enough to get my head round…. But having said that, it does seem to work. I need to be brave and try it again.
The last program was Scribus, a FREE!!! Desk-Top Publishing kit. I’m sure it works well if you know how to use it, but it has been designed by geeks for geeks, rather than for people. Totally unintuitive. It took me 25 minutes to even get some text onto the screen, and that was a fluke. Help was an endless string of jargon: easy for people who already understand the jargon, and who will thus already know how to use it. Amazing… but absolutely typical of computer programs. This is the main reason I always look for FREE!!! applications. Past experience has shown me that bought programs are incomprehensible, so I might as well be baffled and irritated to the point of scrabbling round the ceiling, screaming, for free. (One honourable exception is Audacity, the free sound recorder and editor. I always feel I’m in with a chance with Audacity.)
Handy tip: if ever you, dear reader, should feel the urge to make millions of £££s, all you need to do is write a few little books explaining to the average human how to use some of these powerful but incomprehensible programs. All you need is a very thorough Glossary Box, lots of screen shots and examples, and a series of progressive projects, gradually introducing the applications available. Add plenty of cross-references and revision/tests, and there you go… A huge service to humanity, and millions in the bank for you to squander on ice-cream and polytunnels.
The book I’m working on is called Guide Yourself to Happiness. I wrote it because I am a happy person, and am distressed to see so many other people who are clearly not happy. I’m thinking here especially of the all the young drunks and dope-heads out there, who prefer oblivion and spreading STI’s to companionship three nights a week, and five if possible. But not just them. On a writing course I once met a millionnaire businessman who told me he had huge royalty cheques drop on his doormat every day of the week. He arrived in the biggest Bentley you’ve ever seen and spent most of the time drunk and took no part in the course. He hated his children. About a month later I heard that he had killed himself. I guess that was when I first got interested in Happiness and how it has nothing to do with money. We in the UK have never been so rich or so unhappy, according to endless surveys.
I spent a lot of time thinking about what Happiness is and how it relates to how we think , and wrote the book.
My agent liked it and tried placing it a couple of years ago. All the publishers he approached liked it too, but nobody bought it. One said that they had ‘filled their quota for the year’. ‘Quota’? Box-ticking comes above quality? Worse… two others said they couldn’t accept it as the author ‘did not have his own radio or television show to launch the book from.’
I already had a pretty low opinion of the publishing world from past experience, but this was grotesque. Such laziness… such narrow-mindedness…
So that’s why I’m wrestling with how to put Guide Yourself out there as an ebook. I’m going to offer it for free, as I think it might be of some use to a few people, and that’s good enough for me. Will I survive the upcoming reams of gobbledegook and jargon I’ll have to trawl through before pressing three buttons and seeing the job done? Will I live long enough? I will report progress…
Oh yes.. and while digging out the trench for the polytunnel Seren the brown dog found my little blue pencil. I retrieved most of it.
Have a lovely day Chas G.
Well.. I tried three times to put up a couple of photos, but as ever, the ‘instructions’ were simply too baffling for my poor rational brain. Why do they do this every time? Does nobody ever try out their flashy new system on a couple of real people before imposing it upon us? Answers on a postcard, please.